<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philippe Starck Says Design is Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/</link>
	<description>Write the sequel first.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chief Oddball</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Oddball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I doubt anybody's going to look back fondly at my websites in sixty years or so and say, "A great man designed this."  Hell, by then nobody will probably even remember what a website was, or have the equipment to access one.  How much longer before it's going to be difficult to even play a cassette tape?

I can't say I blame the man for feeling a bit like he's wasted his talents designing crap, like those designers who lend their names to eclectic-looking telephones at Target and Wal-Mart.  As you said, it just seems presumptuous to claim that means design as a whole is dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I doubt anybody&#8217;s going to look back fondly at my websites in sixty years or so and say, &#8220;A great man designed this.&#8221;  Hell, by then nobody will probably even remember what a website was, or have the equipment to access one.  How much longer before it&#8217;s going to be difficult to even play a cassette tape?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I blame the man for feeling a bit like he&#8217;s wasted his talents designing crap, like those designers who lend their names to eclectic-looking telephones at Target and Wal-Mart.  As you said, it just seems presumptuous to claim that means design as a whole is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooch</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>I guess I'd be sad if I was known for designing lemon juice squeezers too. But you're right in that he has to have some massive ego to think that design will die with him.

Hey, I just realized -- no one will care about my creative endeavors after I've died either. There will be no artists in the future! No authors! No web sites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;d be sad if I was known for designing lemon juice squeezers too. But you&#8217;re right in that he has to have some massive ego to think that design will die with him.</p>
<p>Hey, I just realized &#8212; no one will care about my creative endeavors after I&#8217;ve died either. There will be no artists in the future! No authors! No web sites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief Oddball</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Oddball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>"You are flawed!  And imperfect!  Execute your prime function!"

I read it as the lamentations of a guy who just realized he spent most of his life designing inconsequential things that no one will care about when he's gone, and now he wants to make himself feel better by proclaiming that people like him won't even exist in the future.  His statements are borne out of an emotional reaction whose function is to override all logic and reason.

It would have been one thing if he'd simply said that he'd never design again and left it at that.  But no, all the individual, rational thought present in the other six billion inhabitants of planet Earth are apparently not enough to override this man's astoundingly cyclopean ego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are flawed!  And imperfect!  Execute your prime function!&#8221;</p>
<p>I read it as the lamentations of a guy who just realized he spent most of his life designing inconsequential things that no one will care about when he&#8217;s gone, and now he wants to make himself feel better by proclaiming that people like him won&#8217;t even exist in the future.  His statements are borne out of an emotional reaction whose function is to override all logic and reason.</p>
<p>It would have been one thing if he&#8217;d simply said that he&#8217;d never design again and left it at that.  But no, all the individual, rational thought present in the other six billion inhabitants of planet Earth are apparently not enough to override this man&#8217;s astoundingly cyclopean ego.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooch</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2008/03/27/philippe-starck-says-design-is-dead/#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>I like how he contradicts his entire point with that last quote. Unless he means that only designers can design. But then why say what he said about "designers of the future"? Doesn't that imply that there will be design in the future...?!?!

I feel like NOMAD trying to figure this stuff out. Jackson Roykirk! Designers! Non-sequitur! Lemon squeezers! Your facts are uncoordinated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how he contradicts his entire point with that last quote. Unless he means that only designers can design. But then why say what he said about &#8220;designers of the future&#8221;? Doesn&#8217;t that imply that there will be design in the future&#8230;?!?!</p>
<p>I feel like NOMAD trying to figure this stuff out. Jackson Roykirk! Designers! Non-sequitur! Lemon squeezers! Your facts are uncoordinated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
