<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knight Rider TV Movie Details Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/</link>
	<description>Write the sequel first.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chief Oddball</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief Oddball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/#comment-2774</guid>
		<description>I'm starting to think that these publicity photos are not going to represent the actual car seen in the show, at least not 100%.  I went back to the Knight Rider replica car forums today for the first time in years, and it turns out this whole thing runs a lot deeper than I thought.

For instance, many prominent members of the community, including the leading replica parts makers, have been dealing with the production team and have contributed a lot of replica KITT parts to the studio to be used in the film.  The original KITT &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; be making an appearance, and the studio has requested molds and electronics for the classic vox-box.  I have seen some photos from the set which confirm not only the presence of a black thirdgen T-top, but the replica parts being used.

Add to this the fact that there are actually three different Mustangs used for the filming (a "hero" car, an "attack" car and a "remote" car) -- and that cameras were not allowed anywhere near the interior of the gussied-up versions -- and I suspect that there might actually be some kinda cool stuff hiding behind the scenes.

I was also deathly worried, due to the writer's strike, that the film had been penned by chimpanzees.  Apparently, though, the script was written and approved before the strike was called.

I'm hopeful this will turn out to be something pretty fun to watch.

But one thing's for sure, they are going to have to drop &lt;i&gt;Knight Rider 2000&lt;/i&gt; from the continuity.  This movie was undoubtedly written as if both &lt;i&gt;KR2000&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;TKR&lt;/i&gt; (shudder) never happened.  Which is certainly for the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to think that these publicity photos are not going to represent the actual car seen in the show, at least not 100%.  I went back to the Knight Rider replica car forums today for the first time in years, and it turns out this whole thing runs a lot deeper than I thought.</p>
<p>For instance, many prominent members of the community, including the leading replica parts makers, have been dealing with the production team and have contributed a lot of replica KITT parts to the studio to be used in the film.  The original KITT <em>will</em> be making an appearance, and the studio has requested molds and electronics for the classic vox-box.  I have seen some photos from the set which confirm not only the presence of a black thirdgen T-top, but the replica parts being used.</p>
<p>Add to this the fact that there are actually three different Mustangs used for the filming (a &#8220;hero&#8221; car, an &#8220;attack&#8221; car and a &#8220;remote&#8221; car) &#8212; and that cameras were not allowed anywhere near the interior of the gussied-up versions &#8212; and I suspect that there might actually be some kinda cool stuff hiding behind the scenes.</p>
<p>I was also deathly worried, due to the writer&#8217;s strike, that the film had been penned by chimpanzees.  Apparently, though, the script was written and approved before the strike was called.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hopeful this will turn out to be something pretty fun to watch.</p>
<p>But one thing&#8217;s for sure, they are going to have to drop <i>Knight Rider 2000</i> from the continuity.  This movie was undoubtedly written as if both <i>KR2000</i> and <i>TKR</i> (shudder) never happened.  Which is certainly for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pooch</title>
		<link>http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator>Pooch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddballupdate.com/2007/12/12/knight-rider-tv-movie-details-revealed/#comment-2772</guid>
		<description>I suppose it could be fanwanked that "Charles Graiman" was one of Wilton Knight's top scientists or something. They won't do that, of course, but would it really be that hard? They'll probably ignore the entire Knight Foundation, Devon &#038; Co. and say that Michael Knight founded everything. It would be highly amusing if they made some sort of derogatory dig at Knight Rider 2000, now that it'll be eight years after that monstrosity was supposed to have occurred.

It would be totally awesome if history repeated itself and this new Knight Rider (if it got picked up as a series) had to stop referring to their KITT as a "Ford Mustang" because of idiots going to car dealerships and wanting one. "Helmsman! Fire phasers at that black T-top!" :)

The lack of a scanner is stupid. Otherwise, nothing separates it from a normal car, exterior-wise. And what is KITT without the light bar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it could be fanwanked that &#8220;Charles Graiman&#8221; was one of Wilton Knight&#8217;s top scientists or something. They won&#8217;t do that, of course, but would it really be that hard? They&#8217;ll probably ignore the entire Knight Foundation, Devon &#038; Co. and say that Michael Knight founded everything. It would be highly amusing if they made some sort of derogatory dig at Knight Rider 2000, now that it&#8217;ll be eight years after that monstrosity was supposed to have occurred.</p>
<p>It would be totally awesome if history repeated itself and this new Knight Rider (if it got picked up as a series) had to stop referring to their KITT as a &#8220;Ford Mustang&#8221; because of idiots going to car dealerships and wanting one. &#8220;Helmsman! Fire phasers at that black T-top!&#8221; <img src='http://oddballupdate.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The lack of a scanner is stupid. Otherwise, nothing separates it from a normal car, exterior-wise. And what is KITT without the light bar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
